Lastly, the Leo Bodnar boxes are locked to one resolution, while the Time Sleuth is switchable between five resolutions, selectable via a dial control. You can generate any resolution you’d like on each channel, by using this online configurator to download a custom firmware: https://time-sleuth.i74.de/
Then just flash that firmware to the device via the JTAG port and a PC programmer. The current list of supported resolutions are as follows:
240p / 288p / 480i / 480p / 576i / 576p / 720p / 960p / 1080i / 1080p
There’s also a status light that blinks at the same time as the screen flashes. While that might not seem like a big deal, I ran into many scenarios when I wasn’t getting an image on-screen with the Leo Bodnar device; It would always take me a moment to figure out if the batteries ran out, if I was on the right input, etc. Also, you can use a slow motion camera to verify the results of the Time Sleuth, thereby lag-testing the lag-tester ;p
How To Test:
The way both devices work is by flashing a white bar on the top, middle and bottom of the screen. You then hold the device over the white bars and its sensor scans how much time it takes from when the signal is generated to when it shows up on-screen. Flat-screen’s draw the image top-to-bottom (I’m over-simplifying here; describing how TV’s work is a separate thing in itself…), so it’s often thought a fair measurement of display lag is to measure the middle of the screen. The Leo Bodnar tests one at a time and the Time Sleuth will average all three if you’d like.
Testing Each Device:
Next, I went through all the resolutions using the Time Sleuth. The first thing you’ll notice is the much more detailed results! The current lag is displayed on top, as well as averages between all three test points (top, middle, bottom).
Please keep in mind that I was also trying to juggle a camera while holding the device steady, so all my averages in these pictures will be off, since I kept accidentally moving the device around!
You can see the Time Sleuth has a slightly different measurement than the Leo Bodnar on 1080p. I was also able to test all other progressive scan NTSC resolutions and as I always expected, there was a slight difference between them:
I imagine with more extensive testing, the progressive scan resolutions would all average within a millisecond of each other, but this does demonstrate the point that TV’s scalers will react slightly differently to each resolution.
Once again, my averages were off, since I was also dealing with taking pictures while testing…but still, 15ms vs 60 is a giant difference. I’m really interested to see other people’s test results, both to see the differences between progressive and interlaced, as well as the differences between progressive resolutions.
One complaint I often voice about the Leo Bodnar is its compatibility with certain displays. In my testing, I found the Time Sleuth to be compatible with every device I tried, including my curved-screen OLED and even CRT’s via an HDMI to Component converter!
I posted my final results (with correct averages) in the spreadsheet on the main Lag Test page: https://www.retrorgb.com/lagtest.html. I strongly encourage everyone who owns this device to do the same! Not only do we need solid info on what displays have the lowest-lag for gaming, it’ll also be great to finally have a reference for specific situations like 480i gaming!!
The Leo Bodnar devices are around $98, while the Time Sleuth is $80 without a case and $95 with case made from ABS plastic (a prototype 3D printed case is shown in this review). While I wouldn’t call either a “cheap” device, you certainly get more for your money with the Time Sleuth!
In my opinion, the Time Sleuth is the new standard in display lag testing. I hope anyone interested in display lag will purchase one and include the test results wherever applicable. You can pre-order yours here: https://shop.dansprojects.com/time-sleuth-lag-tester.html